left_header
Barratt, Goff & Tomlinson

"Over the past 2 and a half years the support given to us has been quite magnificent and we will be eternally grateful."

space
APIL Accredited Office
space
space
AVMA Specialist Clinical Negligence Panel
space

Barratt, Goff & Tomlinson are
regulated by the
Solicitors Regulation Authority

Copyright
Barratt, Goff &
Tomlinson 2007

space

Cases:
Clinical Negligence

Cecelia
Martin
Stephen

Cecelia's Story

Barratts are often approached by clients who need representation at an inquest. Mrs Welch was admitted to Leicester General Hospital on 23 March 2004. She had a previous history of heart problems and was also suffering from cellulites (a serious skin condition) and weight gain caused by fluid retention. Mrs Welch’s GP recommended she be admitted to hospital where she could be monitored and weighed more regularly and where IV medication could be given which was likely to have better results than oral medication. Unfortunately Mrs Welch had limited input by senior doctors and her medication was changed. She spent the next two weeks being transferred to outlying wards. It became apparent to Mrs Welch's family that her treating consultants rarely visited the ward.

On the morning of Mrs Welch's death her daughter and son-in-law, Linda and David Rowe, were travelling to the hospital with a letter of complaint. The family were shocked to learn of Mrs Welch's death and consequently invited the Coroner to investigate whether the death could have been avoided.

The Coroner held an inquest on 9 and 10 May 2006. At the hearing, doctors involved in Mrs Welch's treatment gave evidence that she was seriously ill on admission and they did not expect her to be discharged. This was the first time that Mrs Welch's family had been informed that she was unlikely to improve. They were very disappointed that it took an inquest to bring this information to light. An independent report from a nursing care expert instructed by the Coroner was highly critical of the monitoring of Mrs Welch's condition which prevented medical staff identifying any improvement or deterioration. The family were upset to learn that Mrs Welch's pain medication was ignored and she did not receive reasonable care which could have improved her quality of life.

Mrs Welch's family would probably have not invited the Coroner to hold an inquest had doctors communicated with them more fully when Mrs Welch was admitted to hospital. However, in light of their determination to investigate what had happened to Mrs Welch, serious failings were identified. It is hoped that the Coroner’s recommendation that the Trust fully investigate and identify ways in which treatment can be improved will help patients in the future.

 
space

Third Party Capture

The Government is coming under increasing pressure to introduce tighter regulations on insurance companies who try to deal directly with personal injury victims who are not policy holders.

more information